Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Superior Court of Justice (Civil). But read these rules first:

Part K, Consolidated Civil Provincial Practice Direction (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• You must exercise careful, informed, and ongoing oversight at all times when you or your staff use AI for court proceedings.
• You must use authoritative sources to verify citations. AI-generated references may include incorrect or fictitious legal authorities. All legal information obtained using the assistance of AI must be verified against trusted and authoritative sources.
• You must comply with obligations under the Consolidated Civil Provincial Practice Direction to hyperlink cases to published websites when submitting factums, compendiums and books of authorities.
• Potential sanctions for the misuse of AI include, but are not limited to: public reprimand of the counsel or litigant, the imposition of cost orders, adjourning a hearing or dismissing the matter, and the initiation of contempt proceedings.

Rule 4.06.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure

• Each citation to an authority in a factum must include a reference to the relevant paragraph, provision or page number of the authority. O. Reg. 300/24, s. 3.
• A factum shall include a statement signed by the party’s lawyer, or on the lawyer’s behalf by someone the lawyer has specifically authorized, certifying that the person signing the statement is satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority cited in the factum.

AI misuse has already happened at the Superior Court of Justice. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Superior Court of Justice (Family). But read these rules first:

Part K, Consolidated Provincial Practice Direction for Family Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• You must exercise careful, informed, and ongoing oversight at all times when you or your staff use AI for court proceedings.
• You must use authoritative sources to verify citations. AI-generated references may include incorrect or fictitious legal authorities. All legal information obtained using the assistance of AI must be verified against trusted and authoritative sources.
• You must comply with obligations under the Consolidated Provincial Practice Direction for Family Proceedings to hyperlink cases to published websites when submitting materials that cite authorities.
• Potential sanctions for the misuse of AI include, but are not limited to: public reprimand of the counsel or litigant, the imposition of cost orders, adjourning a hearing or dismissing the matter, and the initiation of contempt proceedings.

AI misuse has already happened at the Superior Court of Justice. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Superior Court of Justice (Criminal). But read these rules first:

Section I, Consolidated Provincial Practice Direction for Criminal Proceedings (Last updated: January 6, 2025)

• You must exercise careful, informed, and ongoing oversight at all times when you or your staff use AI for court proceedings. The court will not tolerate inadvertence in this regard.
• You must use authoritative sources to verify citations. AI-generated references may include incorrect or fictitious legal authorities, mischaracterizations of case law, and fabricated quotations. This includes legal authorities not included in books of authorities and factums, such as case citations provided during oral argument.
• You must comply with obligations under the Consolidated Provincial Practice Direction for Criminal Proceedings, Part I.A.7 to 9, to hyperlink cases to a publicly available free website such as CanLII when submitting factums and books of authorities, and to include paragraph references each time a case is cited in a factum, with the applicable paragraph also hyperlinked.
• Potential sanctions for the misuse of AI include, but are not limited to: public reprimand of the counsel or litigant, the imposition of cost orders, adjourning a hearing or dismissing the matter, referral to the Law Society of Ontario, where applicable, and the initiation of contempt proceedings.

Rules 32 and 33 of the Criminal Proceedings Rules (Effective May 27, 2024)

• Rule 32 governs books of authorities. By filing a book of authorities, you are confirming that you are satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority cited in it.
• Rule 33 governs factums. Factums are required for all applications, except adjournment applications and bail hearings and reviews, unless otherwise directed by the Court, and must comply with Rule 33.

AI misuse has already happened at the Superior Court of Justice. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Divisional Court. But read these rules first:

AI Section, Consolidated Practice Direction for Divisional Court Proceedings (Last updated: June 8, 2026)

• You must exercise careful, informed, and ongoing oversight at all times when you or your staff use AI for court proceedings.
• You must use authoritative sources to verify citations. AI-generated references may include incorrect or fictitious legal authorities. All legal information obtained using the assistance of AI must be verified against trusted and authoritative sources.
• You must comply with obligations under the Consolidated Practice Direction for Divisional Court Proceedings to hyperlink cases to published websites when submitting factums, compendiums and books of authorities.
• Potential sanctions for the misuse of AI include, but are not limited to: public reprimand of the counsel or litigant, the imposition of cost orders, adjourning a hearing or dismissing the matter, the initiation of contempt proceedings, and referral of counsel to the Law Society of Ontario.

Rule 4.06.1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure

• Each citation to an authority in a factum must include a reference to the relevant paragraph, provision or page number of the authority. O. Reg. 300/24, s. 3.
• A factum shall include a statement signed by the party’s lawyer, or on the lawyer’s behalf by someone the lawyer has specifically authorized, certifying that the person signing the statement is satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority cited in the factum.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Small Claims Court. However, while the Small Claims Court may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: Rules of the Small Claims Court (e-Laws)

AI misuse has already happened at the Small Claims Court. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Court of Appeal for Ontario. However, while the Court of Appeal for Ontario may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. For civil appeals, Rule 4.06.1(2.1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure also requires every factum to include a signed statement certifying the signer is satisfied as to the authenticity of every authority cited.

Source: Practice directions and guidelines · Rules of Civil Procedure (e-Laws)

AI misuse has already happened at the Court of Appeal for Ontario. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Court of Justice. However, while the Ontario Court of Justice may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: Practice directions and policies

AI misuse has already happened at the Ontario Court of Justice. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Landlord and Tenant Board. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

AI misuse has already happened at the Landlord and Tenant Board. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Social Benefits Tribunal. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

AI misuse has already happened at the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Licence Appeal Tribunal. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

AI misuse has already happened at the Licence Appeal Tribunal. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Assessment Review Board. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Child and Family Services Review Board. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Custody Review Board. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Animal Care Review Board. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

AI misuse has already happened at the Animal Care Review Board. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Fire Safety Commission. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Ontario Special Education Tribunal. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: March 17, 2026)

• AI results can be wrong. If you use AI to find legal sources or analyze information, double-check the results carefully. Parties are responsible for the accuracy of any case law, articulations of legal principles, or evidence that is tendered.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. Always verify the information by going directly to trusted sources, such as court or tribunal websites, official publishers, or recognized legal databases like CanLII for case law.
• You are responsible for the accuracy of your written and oral submissions, even if AI helped prepare them. Always cross-check the information against reliable databases to ensure it is accurate and trustworthy. This protects the integrity of our justice system.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Ontario Land Tribunal. But if generative AI created content in a document you file, you must declare it.

Practice Direction on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Tribunal Proceedings (Last updated: January 29, 2026)

• For hearing events starting on or after March 30, 2026, if generative AI was used to create or generate content in a document you file, the first paragraph of that document must contain a declaration identifying the AI-generated content and the person who reviewed and verified it.
• No declaration is needed where AI only suggested changes to, or critiqued, content a human created.
• Declaring AI use does not, by itself, attract an adverse inference.
• Failing to declare, or declaring falsely, may be unreasonable conduct leading to costs under Rule 23 of the OLT Rules of Practice and Procedure, and inaccurate AI-generated material may be struck from the record.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. But if you relied on AI, you must disclose it and certify your review in writing.

Section 20 (Use of Artificial Intelligence), IPC Code of Procedure (Effective: September 9, 2024)

• If you make representations to the IPC and rely on artificial intelligence (AI) in preparing them, you must disclose to the IPC: (a) that AI was used; (b) the type of AI used; and (c) how AI was used (s. 20.01).
• Where AI is used to prepare representations, you must review the accuracy and content of legal references or analysis contained in your representations that are created or generated by AI, and certify in writing to the IPC that you have completed that review (s. 20.02).
• When referring to jurisprudence, statutes, policies, or commentaries in representations, you must use only well-recognized and reliable sources (s. 20.02).
• These rules appear in the Code of Procedure for appeals under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

AI misuse has already happened at the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

Yes. You can use AI to prepare your case before the Condominium Authority Tribunal. But read these rules first:

Practice Direction: Use of Artificial Intelligence in CAT Cases (Effective: December 1, 2024)

• AI can be a helpful tool for parties, but it is not perfect. Be careful if you use AI for research or to prepare documents. AI results can be wrong, can produce inaccurate or outdated information, especially on legal issues, and can struggle with new legal issues or complex cases.
• Parties should indicate if they use generative AI to prepare documents, and include a statement of which AI tool was used.
• The privacy and confidentiality of information and data provided to a generative AI platform may not be guaranteed, and the information may not be secure.
• AI might give you incorrect or made-up legal sources. When citing a CAT case, make sure you can find it on the Tribunal website. For other court decisions, use trusted sources, like court websites or CanLII for case law. Confirm you can find the case, and read the decision to make sure it says what you think it is supposed to say.
• Parties are responsible for the accuracy of submissions, even if AI helped prepare them.
• Misuse can lead to early dismissal: under CAT Rule 19.1(e), the CAT can dismiss an application or case at any time where the applicant has filed documents that they knew or ought to have known contain false or misleading information.
• Misuse can lead to costs: under CAT Rule 48.2, the CAT may, where appropriate, order a party to pay all or part of another party’s costs, including costs directly related to behaviour that was unreasonable, undertaken for an improper purpose, or that caused a delay or additional expense.

AI misuse has already happened at the Condominium Authority Tribunal. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB). However, while the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. Note that Rule 8.5 of the Board Rules of Procedure (introduced August 29, 2025) applies to everyone: case law referred to in a submission must be accompanied by a citation and an electronic link to the decision, and if a link is not possible, a copy of the case must be attached.

Source: OLRB Rules of Procedure (PDF)

AI misuse has already happened at the Ontario Labour Relations Board. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT). However, while the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: WSIAT practice directions

AI misuse has already happened at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Consent and Capacity Board (CCB). However, while the Consent and Capacity Board (CCB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: CCB Rules of Practice

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB). However, while the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board (HPARB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: HPARB practice directions and legislation

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (HSARB). However, while the Health Services Appeal and Review Board (HSARB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: HSARB rules and legislation

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Review Board (ORB). However, while the Ontario Review Board (ORB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: ORB rules and legal resources

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Grievance Settlement Board (GSB). However, while the Grievance Settlement Board (GSB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: GSB Rules of Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Public Service Grievance Board (PSGB). However, while the Public Service Grievance Board (PSGB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: PSGB rules and practice notes

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Law Society Tribunal. However, while the Law Society Tribunal may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. Licensees also remain bound by their professional conduct obligations, including the Law Society of Ontario guidance on generative AI.

Source: LST Rules of Practice and Procedure

AI misuse has already happened at the Law Society Tribunal. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Capital Markets Tribunal (CMT). However, while the Capital Markets Tribunal (CMT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: CMT Rules of Procedure

AI misuse has already happened at the Capital Markets Tribunal. Curious about what happens then? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Financial Services Tribunal (FST). However, while the Financial Services Tribunal (FST) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: FST rules

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB). However, while the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. Appeals from final WSIB decisions go to the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, which is listed separately here.

Source: WSIB adjudication principles

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal (AFRAAT). However, while the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Appeal Tribunal (AFRAAT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. The Tribunal Rules of Procedure address how authorities are cited, so review the citation requirements in the current Rules before filing.

Source: AFRAAT Rules of Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Horse Racing Appeal Panel (HRAP). However, while the Horse Racing Appeal Panel (HRAP) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: HRAP forms and resources

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal (PEHT). However, while the Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal (PEHT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: PEHT Rules of Practice (PDF)

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board (NFPPB). However, while the Normal Farm Practices Protection Board (NFPPB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: NFPPB Rules of Practice and Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Building Code Commission (BCC). However, while the Building Code Commission (BCC) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: Building Code Commission

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Court of the Drainage Referee. However, while the Ontario Court of the Drainage Referee may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: Drainage Act appeals

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Toronto Local Appeal Body (TLAB). However, while the Toronto Local Appeal Body (TLAB) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: TLAB Rules of Practice and Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ottawa Committee of Adjustment. However, while the Ottawa Committee of Adjustment may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. Appeals from Committee decisions go to the Ontario Land Tribunal, where a mandatory AI declaration applies; select the Ontario Land Tribunal above to see it.

Source: Ottawa Committee of Adjustment

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario. However, while the Office of the Ombudsman of Ontario may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. The Ombudsman investigates complaints rather than holding hearings; this entry covers written complaints and supporting materials.

Source: File a complaint with the Ombudsman

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case before a Municipal Integrity Commissioner in Ontario. However, while municipal integrity commissioners may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties. Each Ontario municipality appoints its own integrity commissioner, so check your own municipality procedures.

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario College of Teachers Discipline Committee (OCT). However, while the Ontario College of Teachers Discipline Committee (OCT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: OCT concerns and complaints

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal (OPSDT). However, while the Ontario Physicians and Surgeons Discipline Tribunal (OPSDT) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: OPSDT Rules of Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the College of Nurses of Ontario Discipline Committee (CNO). However, while the College of Nurses of Ontario Discipline Committee (CNO) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: CNO complaints and discipline

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario College of Pharmacists Discipline Committee. However, while the Ontario College of Pharmacists Discipline Committee may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: OCP discipline process

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the Ontario Massage Therapists Discipline Tribunal. However, while the Ontario Massage Therapists Discipline Tribunal may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: Health discipline tribunals Rules of Procedure

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the College of Early Childhood Educators Discipline Committee (CECE). However, while the College of Early Childhood Educators Discipline Committee (CECE) may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: CECE hearings resources

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.

We are not aware of any specific rule preventing you from using AI to prepare your case at the CPA Ontario Discipline and Appeal Tribunals. However, while the CPA Ontario Discipline and Appeal Tribunals may not have a specific rule governing AI use, you are responsible for the accuracy of everything you file. If your materials contain, for example, cases that do not exist, you may be sanctioned for doing so. These sanctions may include, depending on the circumstances, monetary penalties.

Source: CPA Ontario adjudicative tribunals

Curious about what happens when someone misuses AI in an Ontario court or tribunal? Visit our database.