AI and the law

How AI is Disrupting Canadian Courts

Research and tools for courts, lawyers and self-represented litigants.

Learn

Can I use AI in court?

Click on a highlighted province or territory, or the Federal card. Updated daily.

…Courts and tribunals tracked
…With dedicated AI rules or guidance
…That bans or partially bans AI use
…Requires disclosure if AI used
Read the Guide →
FederalRead the Guide → BCABSKMBONQCNBNSPENLYTNTNU
Guide available

Which courts have AI rules?

Search 249 Canadian courts and tribunals and see each one’s AI policy status.

Key Findings

National Picture

Court or tribunalJurisdictionAI policy statusGuide

No bodies match your filters.

What we cover

Adjudicative bodies, courts, tribunals, boards, and commissions, before which parties appear.

Inclusion threshold

A body was included where it had at least 100 reported decisions on the Canadian Legal Information Institute (CanLII). The threshold was lowered to 50 for smaller jurisdictions, for example Prince Edward Island. Bodies that have been dissolved or superseded were excluded.

What the figures mean

The reported figures are computed over this studied population, not over every adjudicative body in Canada.

The population

249 bodies across fourteen jurisdictions: the federal system, the ten provinces, and the three territories.

Courtready.ca, AI Rules in Canadian Courts Tracker, accessed July 2026. https://courtready.ca/ai-in-canadian-courts/

Questions or comments: tom [at] courtready.ca

Download the full report (PDF) →
Our proposal

A Model AI Practice Direction for Canadian Courts and Tribunals

Two-thirds of the courts and tribunals tracked have no AI policy yet. Here’s our proposal:

  • Require disclosure without penalty.
  • Teach parties how to catch AI’s errors.
  • Provide a path to correct AI-related errors.
Read the Model Direction →
Courtready model AI practice direction for Canadian courts and tribunals
The problem

The research.

We track how AI is entering Canadian courtrooms, and how courts respond.

Canadian AI Hallucination Cases Database

…Total Decisions
…Involve Fictitious Citations
…Involve Other AI Misuse

Every reported Canadian decision involving a party submitting non-existent case law, updated daily.

Explore the database →
Canadian AI hallucination cases illustration

Sanctions for AI Hallucinated Cases and Misuse

…Serious Sanctions
…Warnings
…No Sanction

How courts and tribunals have responded, from cost awards to referrals and dismissals.

See the sanctions →
AI sanctions and misuse illustration
The tool

Catch AI-hallucinated case law before they reach the court.

CaseCheck screenshot

CaseCheck

CaseCheck reads a filing, extracts every citation, and checks each one against Canadian case law. Built for courts, lawyers and the public.

Try CaseCheck →
Our ideas

What the System Should do

Where we argue the justice system and AI companies should go from here.

Published

Canada’s national AI strategy leaves out the justice system

The Hill Times
Read article →Subscription required
Published

The missing defendant in Canada’s fictitious case law crisis

CBA National
Published

Inconsistent consequences: how Canadian courts and tribunals respond to AI misuse

Law360 Canada
Published

Beyond Fake Cases: The Other Ways AI Is Going Wrong in Canadian Courts

Slaw.ca

Questions or Partnerships?

We read and respond to every message personally.