Toronto Court Delays: The Case for a Better Booking System
Courtready has tracked the earliest available hearing dates for nine types of civil proceedings at the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto every day since November 2025. This report examines why the current booking system has room for improvement.
Long Waits. Silent Openings.
The Superior Court of Justice in Toronto uses an online booking system for certain types of civil hearings.
In general, wait times were improving, but they have now increased again.
But the data reveals something else. Earlier hearing dates appear in the booking system constantly. Sometimes in blocks, when the Court releases new slots. Sometimes one at a time, when parties cancel. Since November 2025, Courtready has recorded 103 single-day drops where the wait for a given hearing type fell by 50 days or more. Eighty-one of those drops reached 100 days or more.
None of these openings are announced. The only way to catch them is to look constantly. For nine months, we have. Below are four patterns the data reveals.
Multiple hearing categories can improve simultaneously when the Court releases a new block of dates. The Court does not publish a schedule of when these releases happen.
Average wait times fell from 171 days in November 2025 to a low of 84 days in February 2026, then rose to 141 days in July.
Between November 2025 and July 2026, a Civil Case Conference could have been booked within seven days on 118 separate days. These openings appeared without warning and disappeared just as quickly. There is currently no way for litigants to be notified when an earlier date becomes available.
Some hearing categories had stretches where the booking system displayed no available dates for booking. Of the eleven categories tracked, seven had at least one such stretch.
What the data shows.
Explore the data below from November 2025 to July 2026. The number under each month is the average wait time, in days, for that hearing type.
Get notified when an earlier date appears.
Right now, the earliest available court date often goes to whoever refreshes the booking page the most. A better system would notify every party when an earlier date opens, so everyone has a fair chance.
Tom Macintosh Zheng
Co-founder of Courtready
Courtready built the Toronto Court Dates Finder to demonstrate what a notification layer could look like. Parties select a case type. The site watches the booking system. When an earlier date opens, the party is notified.
How we did this.
01 Daily observation
Since November 1, 2025, Courtready has captured the earliest available hearing date for nine types of civil proceedings at the Superior Court of Justice in Toronto. Observations are taken daily through Courtready’s Toronto Court Dates Finder, which automatically scans the Court’s online booking system at regular intervals. The ‘gap’ value reported throughout this report is the number of days between the observation date and the earliest available hearing date offered by the system.
02 Scope
Eleven hearing categories are tracked: Associate Judge motions under 75 minutes (in-person and virtual), Associate Judge motions 90–120 minutes (in-person and virtual), Civil Case Conference, Civil Practice Court, Express Court, Small Claims Rule 12 motions, Small Claims non–Rule 12 motions, Long Trial Scheduling Court, and Short Trial Scheduling. The two trial scheduling categories were added to the study starting April 1, 2026.
03 Monthly averages
Monthly averages exclude days where no booking was available. Days with no dates available for booking are recorded separately. If a category had no bookable dates in an entire month, it is shown as None and is not counted in that month’s overall average.
04 Batch and single-day events
‘Batch release’ events shown in Card 1 are identified where two or more categories improved by 50 days or more on the same day. Single-category day-over-day drops of 50 days or more are counted separately and reported in the Finding section.
05 Limitations
Not all categories of civil hearings are measured in this study. Dates released through other means, such as motions heard directly by a judge or matters booked through the Commercial List, are not captured.
This research is led by Tom Macintosh Zheng, former Toronto-based commercial litigator and co-founder of Courtready. Tom is this year’s winner of the Ontario Bar Association’s OBA Foundation Award.
For media inquiries, email tom@courtready.ca.
Zheng, T. M. (2026). Toronto Court Delays: The Case for a Better Booking System. Courtready. https://courtready.ca/toronto-court-delays-research-report/
